A fairy tale world
Hugo Salinas Price
February 28, 2007
The
World is exchanging goods and services by various national means of
exchange. We are using those same means of exchange as a vehicle for
savings. We are denominating credit contracts in any one of various
national means of exchange. The predominant means of exchange is the US
dollar.
However, a means of exchange voluntarily accepted as
such, by those who participate in exchanging goods and services, by
those who use it as a vehicle for savings and by those who denominate
credit contracts in it, is not per se money.
Money must, sine qua non, function not only as a means of exchange, but also as a means of payment.
The world, as of February 2007, does not possess a means of payment. In economic terms, payment is the exchange of something for something.
In today's world, when units of what is called money are tendered in
payment of a purchase, or in settlement of a balance after an exchange,
or in settlement of debt, there has been in reality and economically no
such payment. We are in these cases using the term "payment" merely as
a legal convention and a leftover from a previous era, when payment did
in fact exist and govern all economic activities.
Money, properly speaking, must be definable! The
dollar cannot be defined: so said Alan Greenspan himself, the Pope of
Central Bankers, in reference to the dollar, which is the reserve
currency of the world and which "backs" all other currencies. When
something is not definable, it has no physical existence. A thing that
has no physical existence is imaginary. An imaginary thing such as
money is today, is as different from real, actual money, as an
imaginary loaf of bread is different from a loaf of bread in one's
hand.
A money payment must involve a tendering of tangible
money, gold or silver, or of a credit instrument which is recognized as
entitling the owner to the undoubted right to immediate redemption of
that instrument, in gold or silver.
Humanity is unaware of the stupendously important
fact that it lives in a world without money. This lack of awareness is
perhaps the most singular feature of our contemporary world, upon which
historians - if the world does survive this episode and produce
historians at some future date - will remark with amazement: "How was
it possible that billions of humans could delude themselves into acting
as if what they used for payments, credit contracts and savings, was
actually money?"
About 1997 I began to look for data concerning the
amount of "reserves", excluding gold, held by the world's Central
Banks. In other words, the amount of imaginary money they were holding,
otherwise called "paper money". In 1997, those "reserves" totaled
$1,300,000,000,000 ($1.3 Trillion) dollars. Not all those "reserves"
are dollars, but most of them are.
Back then, not many people were paying attention to
that datum. Since then, it has received increasing attention, which is
not surprising, for the "reserves" are piling up and showing numbers
that are clearly "going ballistic". As of January 2007, world Central
Bank "reserves" were hitting $5 trillion dollars, an increase of 385%
in ten years. The last increase of $1 Trillion only took five months,
from August 2006 to January 2007. ("Bloomberg")
Before 1971, Central Bank reserves were mainly gold,
plus component of foreign exchange redeemable in gold. Reserves could
only grow very slowly. Imbalances in trade were shunned because the
settlement of deficits had to be made in gold or dollars exchangeable
for gold. International trade was stable. Imports could not affect the
economies of importing countries as much as they do today, with
"globalization". Therefore, local productive activities were stable.
Jobs were generated through reinvestment in productive activities.
The present situation is chaotic, because the
creation of reserves of fictitious, imaginary "money" originates mainly
in Dollars which are spewed forth by the out-of-control US economy,
plus other fictitious moneys like the Euro born in the European Union,
the Yen born in Japan, the Pound born in the UK, all of which are held
by other countries as "reserves".
Since today "money" is imaginary, fictitious,
imports no longer have any limit, for it actually costs nothing to
"pay" when "money" is imaginary. Thus, "globalization" based on the
unlimited creation of fictitious money is a totally false globalization
unsupported by economic facts.
The more important Central Banks are becoming
skittish about the enormous amounts of "reserves" which they are
accumulating. The Central Bankers are bureaucrats, but they are sensing
that these enormous holdings are rather worrisome; however they do not
know what to do about them. The fact is, they have been had. Their
"reserves" are simply numerical and lack any substance. They are
imaginary and as useless as castles in the air, unless they can manage
to get rid of them by passing them on to some unsuspecting seller of
tangible goods.
China is now going around the world - especially
Africa - looking for opportunities to buy raw materials (a Chinese
delegation will be present at the First International Mining Forum in
Mexico, the middle of March). For the same reason, the Central Banks
that subscribed the Washington Agreement (to sell no more than a
certain amount of gold each year) have since 2006 lost their former
appetite for gold sales and they are not covering their allotted sales
quotas. It appears that they have finally realized that the reserves
that are actually worth something are the gold reserves, and not the
"foreign currency" bond holdings which they were so eager to hold
because they "provided earnings".
However, if they start to unload their imaginary
holdings, the exchange value of the holdings will begin to fall. So
they are in a dilemma, a choice between two distasteful alternatives:
"Shall we hold on to the imaginary money and wait and see what happens,
or shall we begin to unload it and risk collapsing the value of the
larger part remaining with us?"
Up till now, the Central Bankers have been doing
what bureaucrats usually do when they are faced with a difficult
choice: nothing. They are waiting to see what happens.
More than half of the world's Central Bank
"reserves" are held by the Central Banks of China, Japan, South Korea
and Southeast Asia. These Central Banks ended up with these huge
"reserves" because they accepted a means of exchange - which was no
more than imaginary money, digits on computer discs - as if it was payment. In other words, they believed a fairy tale, like the one where Jack trades his cow for a handful of colored beans.
So,
we are living in a fairy tale world, where money is not money at all.
Alas, reality cannot be fooled by means of fairy tales. How we shall
fare, when the dream has vanished into thin air and the last fool has
had to recognize the difference between a payment and a fairy tale?
Hugo Salinas Price, President
Asociación Cívica Mexicana Pro Plata, A.C.
Mexico City
http://www.plata.com.mx